Oxford health plans llc v sutter
WebNov 13, 2015 · "Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Ruling Authorizing Class-Wide Arbitration in Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter" Hunton & Williams Client Alert June 18, 2013 ... WebMar 15, 2013 · This article previews the issues and arguments in Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter, to be argued before the U.S. Supreme Court on March 25, 2013. ... In Oxford Health Plans LLC, the Court for the second time during the 2012-13 Term and the sixth time in recent years again addresses the problem of class arbitration. This appeal focuses on the ...
Oxford health plans llc v sutter
Did you know?
WebJun 11, 2013 · In Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter, respondent John Sutter, a pediatrician, had brought claims on behalf of himself and a proposed class of New Jersey physicians against petitioner Oxford Health ... WebOXFORD HEALTH PLANS LLC, Petitioner v. John Ivan SUTTER. No. 12–135. Argued March 25, 2013. Decided June 10, 2013. Synopsis Background: Health plan moved to vacate arbitrator's award authorizing class arbitration of dispute regarding plan's alleged failure to make prompt and accurate reimbursement payments to physicians participating in
WebJul 17, 2013 · In O xford Health Plans, LLC v. Sutter , John Sutter, a physician who provided medical services under a contract with Oxford Health Plans, sued Oxford on behalf of himself and a... WebOn June 10, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter, ruling that an arbitrator’s finding that a contract allowed for class arbitration was a proper exercise of his powers under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) and could not be disturbed by the Court.1 Critically, the Court found that Oxford
WebJun 10, 2013 · Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter Respondent Sutter, a pediatrician, provided medical services to petitioner Oxford Health Plans' insureds under a fee-for-services contract that required binding arbitration of contractual disputes. WebJun 10, 2013 · Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter, No. 12–135, U.S. Supreme Court (June 10, 2013). Factual Background . John Sutter, a pediatrician, was under contract with a health insurance company, Oxford Health Plans, to provide medical care to its members. The contract included the following arbitration clause:
WebJun 10, 2013 · Respondent John Sutter, a pediatrician, entered into a contract with petitioner Oxford Health Plans, a health in-surance company. Sutter agreed to provide medical care … “Maritime transactions”, as herein defined, means charter parties, bills of lading of …
WebOXFORD HEALTH PLANS LLC, Petitioner v. John Ivan SUTTER. No. 12–135. Argued March 25, 2013. Decided June 10, 2013. Synopsis Background: Health plan moved to vacate … dnevnik mjerenjaWebOxford Health Care and physician Sutter were parties to an agreement under which Sutter would provide primary care health services to members of Oxford's managed care network in exchange for compensation. When Sutter brought a class action suit in state court alleging delay and underpayment, the court ordered arbitration. dadju nouvel album 2021WebMar 25, 2013 · Full title: OXFORD HEALTH PLANS LLC, Petitioner v. John Ivan SUTTER. Court: Supreme Court of the United States Date published: Jun 10, 2013 Citations Copy … dnevnik za djevojčiceWebJun 10, 2013 · Compelling parties to resolve disputes through costly, time-consuming, and high-stakes class arbitration, when the parties have not agreed to do so, frustrates the … dadju ok paroleWebOxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter - 569 U.S. 564, 133 S. Ct. 2064 (2013) Rule: Section 10 (a) (4) ( 9 U.S.C.S. § 10 (a) (4)) of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C.S. § 1 et seq., authorizes … dnevnik malog perice onlineWebOxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter United States Supreme Court 569 U.S. 564 , 133 S. Ct. 2064 (U.S. 2013) Facts John Sutter (plaintiff) entered into an agreement with Oxford … dadju photo 2020WebApr 11, 2024 · Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter, 569 U.S. 564, 569 (2013) (alteration adopted) (quotation omitted). “Because the parties bargained for the arbitrator’s construction of their agreement, an arbitral decision even arguably construing or applying the contract must stand, regardless of a court’s view of its (de)merits.” Id. (4) where the ... dnevnik.hr vrijeme sutra